Can machine learning and AI make programmers obsolete? Can AI make software coding and debugging a thing of the past?

Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:53

Can machine learning and AI make programmers obsolete? Can AI make software coding and debugging a thing of the past?

Here’s the proof :

To the reader/asker:

Let’s use the agent to see if it can search at least, when it doesn’t know?

Sam’s Club Just Made a Change to Its Rotisserie Chicken - Allrecipes

And hey Claude? There’s a reserved float division /. if both numbers are floats, for sure (19) but so can one use // even though both are integers (20):

And let’s use the latest, extra-capable model 4.1 from OpenAPI. The result:

Claude boy, how do I do division and modulus in OCaml?

Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang says he's waiting for Elon Musk's Neuralink before he has kids - Business Insider

Now, let’s think about that for a second or two. Such an elementary matter and such egregious error of omission!

Your software developer job is safe for at least the next 100 years.

I don’t think so Claudeboy.

Yankees vs Red Sox Predictions, Picks, Odds, Best Bet, Start Time - Action Network

And ever so dutifully, Claude reports:

Re——-aaaaalllllly.

Agent, are you sure???? You’re lying again, aren’t you?

‘Game changing’ air conditioner recalled due to mold growth — here’s what to do if you own one of these units - New York Post

Ah. Claude Claude Claude.

As usual, I’ll make my point backed by verifiable examples.

You can do modulus with %. In fact, it’s the standard way to do it! (See command 17). And mod is deprecated (command 18):

Why are there posts saying the T in LGBT should be dropped? With what is happening in the US and beyond against the trans community cause for concern that if this is accepted could it be deemed acceptable to start on the LGB community again?

Let’s ask Claude Sonnet 3.5, which is quite the advanced model (at par with Deepseek V3 R1 and GPT 4o) a very simple question:

And presto goes Claude, the clueless junior-dev (it also botched correctly showing //):